Apr. 26th, 2016

stdesjardins: (Steven)
The 2016 Hugo finalists are being announced in a few minutes, making this the perfect time to post my thoughts on fiction eligible for next year's award.

(That sounds like a joke, but isn't. Up until the nominating deadline, I was only reading fiction published last year. After nominations closed, I made an effort to catch up on what I'd missed, so I would be better prepared for next year. Once the finalists have been announced, I'll be busy for a while reading those. So: summary time.)

I ended up rating everything I read from zero to five stars, depending on how likely I am to put it on my nominating ballot, and whether I'd recommend it to others. Five stars means it's almost definitely going on my ballot, four stars means it's a strong contender, three stars means it's probably not going on my ballot but I'd recommend it, two stars are the mass of good stories that I wouldn't go out of my way to recommend, one star are stories that I would recommend against reading, and zero stars are stories that the author should feel shame for having written. Nothing so far has gotten zero or five stars.

long list of stories )
Page generated Jul. 28th, 2017 02:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios